Mortgages
and The Credit Crisis. Special Report
What
is happening and how does it affect you
What
is the back ground to the Credit Bubble / Crisis?
What's
happening now?
It
might not be all that bad
Omigod.
The credit crisis could get much worse
What is happening and how does it affect you
Basically
Banks have stopped trusting each other. This matters
because it means they aren't lending each other
money which means there is a "liquidity crisis".
This
affects normal people like us because banks and
building societies can't / won't lend as much to
consumers.
After
increasingly liberal lending over the past decade
or so, they are reverting to old conservative attitudes.So
mortgages, credit cards and personal loans will
probably be more difficult / expensive to get.
What
is the back ground to the Credit Bubble / Crisis?
The
problem started with banks creating ever more complicated
"lending instruments" which they used
to trade between themselves. These lending instruments,
which enjoyed various fancy names like "collateralised
debt obligations", are a way for banks
to buy and sell "packages of debt" amongst
each other.
So
far, so boring...
The
problem was how these instruments were made up.
Debt is usually secured against something.
In the case of mortgages your mortgage debt is secured
against the value of your property. If
you default on your mortgage payments the bank simply
kicks you out into the street and sells your house.
That is how they get their money back.
But
here's what happened with the "lending instruments".
Let's
take two banks, that have no resemblance to any
person, living or dead. At all.
The
first one, the Bank of Overpaid Suits might have
said to their buddies at the Bank of Humour Bypasses;
"we have lent X million groats. This is
secured on Y million houses. We don't want to have
to wait for 30 long winters to see all the debts
repaid. Would you like to buy it from us for some
upfront cash?".
The
Bank of Humour Bypasses gets a couple of smart kids
to look through the figures. These kids are just
about the only people who begin to understand what
the heck is in the "instrument". The kids
give it the nod and the bank agrees to buy it. But
the problem is that later on the Humour Bypasses
realise that the property the debt was secured against
is not worth as much as they thought.
This
is basically what has happened with the sub prime
mortgage and loans crisis in the US.
For a variety of reasons, particularly the insane
need to please shareholders by making ever bigger
profits every year - or you're fired - the banks
started lending to people who could not only not
afford to buy a house - but would never be able
to afford one and so should never have been lent
to.
The
problem was that these poor people were offered
all sorts of attractive sales-trick discounts which
meant they didn't have to pay much money for, say,
the first couple of years.
The sales people who convinced these poor rubes
they could afford their very own homes had got their
commissions and long since disappeared by the time
the real monthly repayment levels kicked in.
And
surprise, surprise, a lot of these poor folk couldn't
meet the repayments and had their homes repossessed.
What
none of the incredibly clever "masters of the
universe", who run the financial institutions
involved, seemed to realise was that when you start
repossessing houses in a big way, the value of property
tends to fall - in a big way. And if that happens
then loans secured against property are suddenly
worth a lot less than had been
thought.
|
The
major failure occurred with the credit
ratings agencies like Standard and
Poor and Moddys. These firms were paid by
the banks to grade the reliability of the
loans. They gave top AAA ratings to many packages
that turned out to have been worthless. So
it wasn't all the fault of the banks. But
frankly everyone should have known better... |
So
as the banks were trading their clever "instruments"
among each other, and the penny started to drop,
it seems the clever ones who had got it first started
playing a game of pass the parcel.
The
banks soon realised that they couldn't trust each
other and stopped lending to each other. This is
why Northern Rock got into difficulties. It relied
on borrowing money from other banks. But that dried
up.
More
recently, the seventh largest investment bank in
the US, Bear Sterns basically went bust when no
other bank would lend them the price of a cup of
tea. They were "rescued" by another bank
- But that's another story, and probably one of
only several to come in the next few months.
Idle
question: What happened to the lesser spotted
"Moral Hazard"
- the idea that regulators should not bail
out idiots, or there would be no reason future
idiots should worry about acting recklessly?
This phrase was heard quite often in the early
days of the credit crunch. But it seems to
have flown out the window as the crisis gained
pace. The problem now is that unlesss teh
authorities do something the whole system
might implode. So much for the free market... |
What's
happening now?
At
the time of writing, in late March in the year of
our Lord 2008, the good ship western capitalist
system is sailing blindly into a fog. No one
is sure what is going to happen. But a few of the
older sailors on board are shouting something about
rocks.
Some
commentators are talking of a huge, unimaginable
crisis where the entire investment banking
system will collapse.
That's
not great for people who work in them, but would
that be such a bad thing for the rest of us? Consider
this:
"...there's
a common thread linking all the major UK mortgage
lenders that have been worst hit by the credit crunch.
Northern Rock, Alliance & Leicester and Bradford
& Bingley were all mutual building societies
that, in the dying days of the Conservative administration,
decided that floating on the stock market would
give them access to "crucial" extra capital....
it doesn't have to be this way.
Take
a look at Caja Madrid, a Spanish savings and loans
provider which must annoy the hell out of the investment
banks as it is not quoted on the Madrid bourse.
It has grown into the fourth-largest financial institution
in Spain, and virtually all its profits - which,
in 2007, were more than £2.1bn - go to the
Fundacion Caja Madrid, dedicated to financing social
and cultural projects. Compare that to the disaster
that has befallen the Northern Rock Foundation.
Patrick
Collinson The Guardian, Saturday February 23 2008
What
does seem certain in the UK is that the property
market is going to be affected.
...possibly
badly. House prices rose and rose over the past
few years, contrary to many experts who, quite logically,
kept predicting a price crash.
What
it seems they missed was that the UK - unlike the
USA - is overcrowded and has only a finite amount
of land.
In
addition the opening of the borders to the new wave
of immigrants from places like Poland... meant a
huge influx of cheap foreign labour came in.
Not only did these foreigners undercut our honest
salt-of-the-earth British builders and plumbers
who had gained such a good reputation with their
reliability, working long hours for honest wages,
but they also needed somewhere to live.
This
meant that all the speculative buy to let landlords
had customers. So our nice new Polish plumbers not
only did some work but they acted as a lubricant
on the UK property market.
Unfortunately
Stanislav and his mates look as if they are drifting
back to Poland. (You're welcome back any time pal).
So that might put more pressure on the buy to let
brigade might not be able to find new tenants, and
might be forced to sell.
At
the same time, thanks to the credit crunch, the
Ones Who Should Be Looked Upon With Respect
who run our Building Societies and Banks are putting
their ankle length skirts back on and no longer
dancing with any old stranger...
...
meaning they are not lending to any comers any more,
particularly not to anyone with bad credit - of
which there are quite a few... thanks to the irresponsible
lending of the same banks, who knew at the time
that they should have known better but did it anyway.
A
fairly certain outcome is that UK property prices
will go down
..
possibly only by 5%, as predicted by the Nationwide
recently, possibly by a whole lot more.. See Freeze
on Lending to Hit House Prices - Sunday Times
The
"perfect storm" for the housing market
sees the following weather fronts colliding:
As
people start coming to the end of their fixed term
deals they are going to find it difficult to get
the cheap mortgage deals they were expecting. Which
means they will have less money to spend... which
means there will be a recession, which means there
will be less money around... which means people
will have less money to spend...
Three
million people will be coming off fixed rate deals
in the next year or so.
It
is estimated that they will have to find an extra
£300 a month to meet the higher mortgage costs.
Some
people will not be able to meet their higher payments
which will lead to more repossessions.
Meanwhile people will be reluctant to sell if they
aren't getting a good price which will contribute
to a major slowdown in the UK residential property
market.
In
any event, considering all the newly repossessed
properties on the market... it will probably be
a buyers market.
Two
possible effects of the internet on house
prices may be worth noting here.
Firstly,
the UK Land Registry records all property
sales. property bought or sold since April
1, 2000 is available on their website. This
is replicated by several property websites.
So anyone buying a house that the vendors
themselves bought after 2000 will be able
to quickly see what it was worth then.
While all prices are available in the archives,
human nature, with its habit of taking the
quicker easier road and making up its mind,
prematurely and stubbornly, dictates this
will result in those post 2000 houses being
harder to sell for very much more than the
vendors paid for them.
Secondly
more people will probably use the "for
sale by owner" type websites. By paying
a small fee to advertise online and saving
3% on Estate Agents fees, houses might sell
for less but still net their owners as much
as before
|
It
Might Not be that Bad
Reasons
to be cheerful:
•
The regulators are much more organised that they
used to be. In the Big Bad Banking Crisis of ye
olde 1907 the great JP Morgan single handedly averted
a similar crisis by knocking heads together. His
initiative, unprecedented at the time, became the
model for future regulation.
•
Ben
Bernanke is an expert on what happened with
the Great
Depression
•
In the UK land will not grow on trees. There will
still be a basic scarcity factor to make property
valuable.
•
The immigrants, be they rich or normal workers,
will continue to come from Eastern Europe and elsewhere
for many a year.
• As part of their contribution to our economy
they will have to pay for somewhere to live. After
a normal readjustment to the market, prices will
probably remain basically sound.
•
The noble trade of Mortgage lending will continue.
It just won't be as stupid as before. Well it'll
be a while at least before the madness of 125% loan
to values in no-go areas returns. Till then it will
simply go back to where it was in the 70s and 80s...
responsible lending based on a look at the applicants
reliability and ability to repay. Remember
the mortgages of yesteryear? You soon will - The
Independent
•
The economy itself will be OK. "Fortunately,
and contrary to some of the things you may have
read and heard, [credit is not suddenly drying up].
Credit is certainly tougher to get hold of for some
borrowers and will be for some time, but there is
still plenty around. David
Smith, Economics Editor of The Sunday Times.
It could get much worse
aaaiiieee.
We're all going to die
There
are some arguments that things could be much worse
•
"The global economy is built on sand, or rather
a vast edifice of credit. Credit gives investors
the same kick as alcohol offers; it makes them feel
invincible. As they borrow money to buy assets,
their actions make asset prices rise. Rising prices
make banks feel more confident about lending money,
giving the spiral more impetus".
From the otherwise more optimistic
Philip
Coggan, Buttonwood columnist for The Economist
•
Fred Harrison's 1999 book, Boom Bust: House
Prices, Banking and the Depression of 2010
identified a property cycle from over 300 years
of history with the major conclusion that housing
booms precede recessions. In 2005 Harrisson, the
director of the Land Research Trust refined his
date by saying the crash would "All happen
in 2008"
•
Harrison also says the difference this time is Globalisation
/ market liberalisation means that the enitire world
economy is much more inter twined and co dependent
that it has ever been before. So no one is truly
in control.
•
... and: "the best thing investors can do for
themselves is to shift their portfolios into assets
that can quickly be liquidated. Don’t believe
anyone who says that the property market is going
to recover strongly from here and don’t believe
anyone who says that even if it doesn’t, the
effect of housing on the wider economy is marginal.
It isn’t. It is absolutely key
to the health of both the UK and the global economy.
•
"Or it could be that the seeds of the next
downturn are already sown, and are reflected in
the recent rise in bond yields in major economies
to their highest level for several years. Bond yields
are important because they reflect two related things
– market expectations of inflation and market
expectations of interest rates, over the longer
term. So the recent rise tells us the markets have
become gloomier about inflation, or about interest
rates, or both.
Personal
website of David Smith, Economics Editor of The
Sunday Times (Note this is same chap as in the
optimists corner above)
•
Alan Greenspans, the much lauded former chairman
of the US Federal Reserve take on the problem is:
"The current financial crisis in the US is
likely to be judged in retrospect as the most wrenching
since the end of the second world war. It will end
eventually when home prices stabilise and with them
the value of equity in homes supporting troubled
mortgage securities." See Financial
Times
•
Anna Schwartz, the "revered" montarists
says it's all Greenspans fault: "while chair
of the Fed the central bank itself became the chief
cause of the credit bubble, and now seems stunned
as the consequences of its own actions engulf the
financial system. "The new group at the Fed
is not equal to the problem that faces it,"
she says, daring to utter a thought that fellow
critics mostly utter sotto voce".
Oh dear. When the blame game starts between elderly
Americans there must be a problem. (Then again,
these aren't the nice cuddly America old folk we
all love. These are high priests of the discredited
monetarist theory) Anna
Schwartz blames Fed for sub-prime crisis
•
The word credit is from the Latin word credere (“to
trust”). The problem now is the lack of faith
has turned the subprime mortgage crisis into what
is possibly the worst financial crisis for several
decades
To
read more on the real pessimists view points a "good"
place to start is the Prudent
Bear website of David W. Tice
But
the final word from us is that any crash won't last
too long. Everyone over the age of 35 in the UK
will remember the severe housing slumps of the eighties
and early nineties. The thing is that houses that
could not be sold for a pittance then, subsequently
sold for huge multiples of what they used to be
worth. At the time people really though things would
never pick up again. But boy did they.
It
is this recognition that one day property will be
worth something again that will keep a "bottom
to the market".
As
to the wider economy; humans need to eat. They need
to trade. As long as the sun shines and food can
be grown there will always be farmers and traders.
The
real issue is whether the serious concerns about
the environment come true. If food can't be grown
that is where we will have a real problem.
|